Update on fighting the Congestion Charge: second reply
The Congestion Charge have replied to my last letter here's a copy of that letter:
NON-NEGOTIABLE [address] 07/12/2020 (The Seventh of December, 2020) Transport For London Congestion Charging PO Box 344 Darlington DL1 9QE Please also C.C for the attention of: Sadiq Khan, and all those who are relevant Reference: Number Plate: Dear Sirs, I, Name of the family: Surname, wrote to you on Twenty-First [21] Of November requesting the following lawful documentation, so that I may settle any financial obligation I might lawfully owe and I also requested that ALL documentation to be presented to me in SUBSTANCE and with FULL DISCLOSURE: 1. Proof that you still hold the original instrument of indebtedness. 2. Validation of the debt and proof that Transport For London (or any of its affiliated agents, parent companies, proxies, etc) actually suffered a loss (Copy of the actual accounting). 3. Proof of your claim against me in the form of a sworn affidavit; or an original and valid bill, with the words “Bill”/“Invoice” and “Value” on the face of it, complete with signature. 4. Copies of any bi-lateral or tri-lateral contracts which create obligations on each party to perform, evidenced as such by signatures binding the parties in agreement, INCLUDING any delegated Instrument of Novation, signed and sealed in a tripartite contract. 5. An Equitable Deed of Assignment (not a notice of assignment – two very different legal documents) should be made available to validate your claims. This should be executed as a Deed, granted by the grantor or original creditor and indorsed by instrumentary witnesses in solemn form. As you have failed to provide the aforementioned documentation to validate your claim, I hereby give you a further ten (10) days to reply to this notice from the above date. Your failure to provide the aforementioned documentation within ten (10) days, from the above date, to validate the debt, will constitute your agreement to the following terms - that the debt did not exist in the first instance and that I the owner of the vehicle in question with the registration number [numberplate] am no longer obliged to pay The Congestion Charge; and that you will be held liable for any and all damages to Name of the family: Surname incurred by your actions. Further that any negative remarks made to a credit reference agency be removed forthwith, and you will no longer pursue this matter. Please also note that any further invalid claims against Name of the family: Surname and/or attempting to contact Name of the family: Surname will constitute Harassment under Section 1 of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 and the Administration of Justice Act 1970 S.40, and against FCA guidelines, which may result in legal action for compensation for the anxiety and any financial loss caused. Without malice or mischief, in sincerity and honour Yours sincerely By: Name, of the family: Surname Authorised Agent and Representative for MR/MISS NAME NAME SURNAME ™ Standing under the Jurisdiction of the Common Law Court No assured value, No liability. Errors & Omissions Excepted. All Rights Reserved. WITHOUT RECOURSE – NON-ASSUMPSIT Calls maybe recorded
and this was the reply I got from Congestion Charge via email:
Thank you for your enquiry received on 09 December 2020.
TfL would initially like to advise that the correspondence received does not make clear as to the nature of your enquiry.
However, TfL does not consider that any of the points raised in your correspondence preclude the issue of any charges you have incurred on your Autopay account and is therefore of the opinion that the arguments and or issues raised are wholly misconceived.
If you require any further information from TfL, please do not hesitate to contact us. If you have any questions, please visit tfl.gov.uk/congestioncharge or call us on 0343 222 2222 (textphone 0207 649 9123 if you have impaired hearing).
Yours sincerely
D. Milton
Contracts & Operations Manager
Transport for London
Comments